![]()
|
efficiency using fibroblastic differentiation Hugo J. Niggli*a,c, Corinne Scalettaa, Yan Yub, Fritz-Albert Poppb and Lee Ann Applegatea aDepartment of Obstetrics, Laboratory of Oxidative Stress
and Ageing, University Hospital, CHUV bInternational Institute of Biophysics, IIB, ehm. Raketenstation,
Kapellener Strasse c*Address for correspondence : BioFoton AG, P.O. Box
28, CH-1731 Ependes, Switzerland Dedicated to the memory of Alexander Gurwitsch on the occasion of his 125th birthday. Abstract Photons participate in many atomic and molecular interactions and changes. Recent biophysical research has shown the induction of ultraweak photons in biological tissue. It is now established that plants, animal and human cells emit a very weak radiation which can be readily detected with an appropriate photomultiplier system. Although the emission is extremely low in mammalian cells, it can be efficiently induced by ultraviolet light. In our studies, we used the differentiation system of human skin fibroblasts from a patient with Xeroderma Pigmentosum of complementation group A in order to test the growth stimulation efficiency of various bone growth factors at concentrations as low as 5ng/ml of cell culture medium. In additional experiments, the cells were irradiated with a moderate fluence of ultraviolet A. The different batches of growth factors showed various proliferation of skin fibroblasts in culture which could be correlated with the ultraweak photon emission. The growth factors reduced the acceleration of the fibroblast differentiation induced by mitomycin C by a factor of 10-30%. In view that fibroblasts play an essential role in skin aging and wound healing, the fibroblast differentiation system is a very useful tool in order to elucidate the efficacy of growth factors. 1. Introduction At the beginning of this century, Alexander Gurwitsch, born 125 year ago in Russia, suggested that ultraweak photons transmit information in living systems [1] as summaraized recently [2]. Although the results of Gurwitsch were refuted by Hollander and Klaus [3] and the interest for this subject declined in the following decades, the presence of biological radiation was re-examined with the development of photomultiplier tubes in the mid-fifties by Facchini and co-workers [4]. In the sixties most of the work on ultraweak photon emission was performed by Russian scientists [5-7], while in Western countries several pioneers, Quickenden in Australia [8], Popp in Germany [9] and Inaba in Japan [10], independently developed methods for ultraweak photon measurements in a variety of different cells by the use of a extremely low noise, highly sensitive photon counting system which allows maximal exploitation of the potential capabilities of a photomultiplier tube. In the meantime it is commonly agreed that plant, animal and human cells emit ultraweak photons often called biophotons [11-17]. From these and additional investigations different origins for this very weak radiation have been proposed. Most investigators think that very weak radiation results from radical reactions which can be produced by biological events such as lipid peroxidation. In studies of microsomal lipid peroxidation [18,19], it has been shown that the amount of malonaldehyde production and the intensity of emitted light are related to each other. Based on these studies, Inaba and co-workers proposed [20] that oxygen dependent light emission in rat liver nuclei was caused most likely by lipid peroxidation in the nuclear membrane. As discussed in detail by Cadenas and Sies [21], free radical decomposition of lipid hydroperoxides leads to the formation of excited chemiluminescent species by the self-reaction of secondary peroxy radicals formed from lipids, producing either singlet molecular oxygen or excited carbonyl groups. However, there also exists a very interesting model published in 1983 by Nagl and Popp [22] suggesting that there is a negative feedback-loop in living cells which couples together states of a coherent ultra-weak photon or biophoton field and the conformational state of the cellular DNA. The authors assume photon transfer or non-radiation chemical pumping from the cytoplasmic metabolism which results in changes of the DNA conformation via exciplex/excimer formation. Their hypothesis is based on experimental data reviewed by Birks [23] who also suggested these excimers as precursors of the pyrimidine photodimers which play a key role in the radiation damage of DNA and has been most recently proposed as biomolecular signals in communication [24]. It was hypothesized that there exists an effective intracellular mechanism of photon absorption in normal human cells [25]. After UV-light irradiation of cells, pyrimidines absorb the energy in order to form pyrimidine dimers which could be responsible for influencing metabolic and cellular events as was recently shown for photodimer induced melanogenesis [26]. Tilbury discussed in the multi-author review of van Wijk [27] that ultraweak photon emission has been detected in both the visible and ultraviolet region. Radiation in the visible region appears to be due to excited carbonyl groups and/or excited singlet oxygen dimers arising from lipid peroxidation, which in turn are associated with an increase in various reactive oxygen species such as the superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical and singlet oxygen. There is also substantial evidence for DNA playing a key role in these emissions as discussed above [9,28,29]. This macromolecule may especially be involved in the emission of ultraweak photons by the cell in the UV-region of the spectrum [27]. Recently, experiments with cultured human cells were reported [25] in which normal and DNA excision repair deficient Xeorderma pigmentosum of complemation group A (XPA) cells were UV-irradiated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and Earle's balanced salt solution (EBSS) and assessed for ultraweak photon emission. There was some evidence of induced photon emission from normal cells in Earle's balanced salt solution, but clear evidence of a fluence-dependent emission in XPA cells in medium and in EBSS were seen. Overall, it was clear that an important difference between normal and XPA cells was present and it is possible that XPAn cells are less able to absorb ultraweak photons in contrast to normal cells. Since Hayflick's pioneering work in the early sixties, human diploid fibroblasts have become a widely accepted in vitro model system. Recently, Bayreuther and co-workers extended this experimental approach showing that fibroblasts in culture resemble, in their design, the hemopoietic stem-cell differentiation system [30]. They reported morphological and biochemical evidence for the fibroblast stem-cell differentiation system in vitro. They showed that normal human skin fibroblasts in culture spontaneously differentiate along the cell lineage of mitotic fibroblasts (MF) MFI-MFII-MFIII and post-mitotic fibroblasts (PMF) PMF IV-PMFV-PMVI-PMFVII. Additionally, they developped methods to shorten the transition period and to increase the frequency of distinct post-mitotic cell types using physical or chemical agents such as mytomycin C, 5-fluorouracil, and 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine, that have been reported to induce differentiation in a variety of cell systems, as we have recently summarized [31-36]. Mitomycin C is an effective chemotherapeutic agent for several cancers in man; this effect is probably related to the interaction with DNA leading to DNA-DNA crosslinks and DNA-protein crosslinks. We have previously demonstrated that the mitomycin C-treatment of three different normal human fibroblast strains (CRL 1221, GM 38 and GM 1717), frequently used in mutation, transformation, and aging research, induces characteristic morphological changes in the fibroblasts and brings about specific shifts in the [35S]methionine polypeptide pattern of total cellular proteins [31]. These results support the notion that mitomycin C accelerates the differentiation pathway from mitotic to postmitotic fibroblasts. Using this system, we were also able to demonstrate that no significant difference exists in the rate and the extent of the excision-repair response to thymine-containing pyrimidine dimers following UV-irradiation shortly after mitomycin C treatment of distinct strains of human skin fibroblasts and in the mitomycin C-induced PMF stage of these cells [31]. In addition, aphidicolin inhibits excision repair of UV-induced pyrimidine photodimers in low serum cultures of mitotic and mitomycin C-induced postmitotic fibroblasts of human skin [32]. In view that fibroblasts play an essential role in skin aging and wound healing, our results imply that the fibroblast differentiation system is a very useful tool in order to elucidate the efficiency of growth factors. 2. Material and Methods 2.1. Growth factor samples Three different lots of bovine bone growth factors (BP2, 3 and BP5) in cryotubes (lyophilised; 1 mg/tube) were provided by Jeff Moehlenbruck (Sulzer Biologics, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA). In the following experiments factors BP2, BP3 and BP5 were tested at a concentration of 5 ng/ml. The mitotic cells were treated one week, while the postmitotic cells were incubated with these growth factors during two weeks. The growth factors were also added during treatment with mitomycin C to put the cells in post-mitotic status. 2.2. Cell culturing Skin fibroblasts (GM05509A) derived from a 17 year old female patient affected with Xeroderma pigmentosum of complementation group A (XPA) were obtained from the Human Genetic Mutant Cell Repository (Camden, NJ, USA). XPA cells derived from a 10-year -old female (CRL 1223) were purchased from the American Type culture collection (Rockeville, USA). Cells were cultured in tissue culture plastic flasks (surface, 75cm2, Gibco Basel, Switzerland) in 15 ml Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco, Basel Switzerland) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 100 units (U) ml-1 penicillin-streptomycin as previously described [37]. XPA cells were plated 1:3 and passages 15-17 were used. Postmitotic fibroblasts were prepared as previously described [33]. For the determination of ultraweak photon emission in mitotic fibroblasts, 3x 105 cells were seeded into 10 cm diameter tissue culture dishes and grown for 1 week until confluency with and without growth factors at a density of 5ng/ml. UVA-irradiated fibroblasts and control cells were frozen gently in liquid nitrogen in DMEM from which phenol red had been omitted. For the determination of ultraweak photons in postmitotic fibroblasts, 1.5x105 cells were seeded into 10 cm diameter tissue culture dishes. 48 h later the medium was removed and new complete medium containing 2x10-7 M mitomycin C with and without growth factors was added for 24 h. The medium was then removed and new complete DMEM with and without growth factors was added for 4 days. Cells were additionally treated with 2x10-7 mitomycin C essentially as described elsewhere [37]. The medium was removed and new complete DMEM with and without growth factors was added for 7 days until they have been in a postmitotic stage. Control cells which have been immediately treated with mitomycin C were also used. Cells were counted in a haemocytometer from Neubauer (Flow Laboratories, Baar, Switzerland) and cells were counted in triplicates ( + 10%). Cells were frozen in liquid nitrogen using the cryopreservation apparatus from Biotech Research Laboratories (Rockeville, MD, USA). Controlled gradual temperature reduction during cryopreservation was critical for the maintenance of cell life and viability. This apparatus preserves cells by cooling at the rate of 1°C per minute when placed in a -70° C freezer. After 5 hours or overnight, frozen samples were transferred to the liquid nitrogen transport storage system. Since frozen cell samples using this procedure survive also without DMSO as checked by tryptan blue coloration, no DMSO was added. 2. 3. Irradiation facilities for UVA radiation exposure Before irradiation the cells were rinsed twice with 3 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), covered with 4ml PBS and were irradiated as monolayers in tissue culture dishes at room temperature. For UVA radiation a UVASUN 3000 lamp (Mutzhas, Munich, Germany) was used at a dose rate of 300-600 Wm-2 at a distance of 60-90 cm. Irradiation periods were on the average of 10-45 min maximum. The spectral output of the lamp was analyzed with a calibrated Optronic model 742 spectroradiometer (Optronics Laboratories Inc., Orlando, FL, USA). Before and after each experiment radiation fluences were monitored by an International Light Radiometer (IL 1700, calibrated against the spectroradiometer). The emission spectrum was between 340 and 450 nm with a maximum at 380+ 30 nm and the cells were then frozen in liquid nitrogen as described above until measurements on ultraweak photon emission. 2. 4. Ultraweak photon determinations For ultraweak photon emission measurements different fibroblasts samples were transported in liquid nitrogen. Some cells were transported fresh in T-75 flasks and used for ultraweak photon emission. The cells were thawed and were diluted in a volume of 10 ml Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, from which phenol red was omitted, and were transferred to a quartz sample glass (inside dimensions 2.2x2.2x3.8 cm3; wall thickness 0.15 cm). Detection and registration of spontaneous and light-induced emitted photons was accomplished at 25° C as described before [25]. The test samples were kept in a dark chamber in front of a single photon counting device equipped with an EMI 9558 QA photomultiplier tube (diameter of the cathode 48mm, cooled to -25° C). This high-sensitivity photon counting device is described in detail by Popp and co-workers [9,38] and measures photon intensities as low as 10-17 W in the range between 220 and 850 nm. Signal amplification is normally 106-107 and dark count ranges between 10-15 counts per second (cps). Maximum efficiency of the S20-cathode is 20-30% within the range of 200-350nm (maximum is at 250 nm), decaying almost linearly down to 0% at a wavelength of 870 nm and mean quantum efficiency in the entire spectral range is about 10%. The integral intensity values within each interval of 40 ms was stored and processed by an interfaced computer. For light induced emission experiments, irradiation of the test sample was performed perpendicular to the detecting direction with focused white light from a 75-W Xenon lamp. Each measuring cycle was started by irradiating the sample for 5s. The measurements for the monochromatic light induction was performed by changing the spectrum of the inducing light through a monochromomator (PTI, Hamburg, Germany) from 300 to 450 nm (25nm interval). 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Bone factor induced proliferation in fibroblastic differentiation Proliferation of fibroblasts was determined by counting cultured cells following a one to two week treatment with 5 ng/ml DMEM of each lot of bone growth factor. The percentage of increase of cell proliferation was between 0 and 60% as shown in Table 1. Table 1. Percentage of cell counts in immediately trypsinized monolayer fibroblasts with and without treatment with growth factors (100 % correspondend to 3.0 x 106 mitotic fibroblasts (controls and miotomycin C-treated) and 0.9x105 postmitotic fibroblasts).
Growth Factor Efficiency: BP3>BP5>BP2 3.2. Ultraweak photons in mitotic and postmitotic human skin fibroblasts from patients with Xeroderma pigmentosum (XPA) We performed ultraweak photon experiments in the fibroblast differentiation system with human skin fibroblast from Xeroderma pigmentosum patients (GM 05509A; CRL1223). Bayreuther and co-workers [30-36] showed biochemical and morphological evidence for the fibroblast differentiation system in vitro. They showed that normal human skin fibroblasts in culture spontaneously differentiate along the cell lineage of mitotic (MF) and postmitotic fibroblasts (PMF). Additionally, they developed methods to shorten the transition period and to increase the frequency of distinct postmitotic cell types using physical agents such as ultraviolet light (UV) and mitomycin C (MMC). To differentiate the human skin fibroblasts we have used mitomycin C. Mitotic skin fibroblasts are small in size in contrast to postmitotic cells which are enlarged by a factor of up to ten [33]. As shown in Fig. 1 there is no discernible difference between untreated mitotic fibroblasts, miotomycin C treated cells and MMC-induced postmitotic cultures one week following MMC-treatment in age-matched XPA cells (GM05509 A; CRL 1223; 4x107/ cells). Figure 1. Total counts of photoinduced ultraweak photon emission registered in the first second after illumination with white light during 30 s of XPA human skin fibroblasts. Background values obtained with medium alone are subtracted. Average of two independent experiments in triplicate. Standard deviation is + 10%. We have previously found that postmitotic fibroblasts are significantly reduced in UV-induced ornithine-decarboxylase responses [33]. In skin fibroblasts from a patient with Xeroderma pigmentosum (XPA) we detected a slight increase in the rate of thymine dimer induction formed after UV-irradiation of the MMC-induced postmitotic stage three weeks after MMC-treatment [31]. For ultraweak photon emission, our experiments with cultured human cells in which normal and XPA cells were UV- irradiated showed an important difference between normal and XP cells for the absorption of photons [25]. Since the white light induction for ultraweak photon emission in the differentiation system with XPA cells was very similiar in both cell lines (see Fig. 1), we decided to test the growth factors with the still commercially available skin Xeroderma Pigmentosum fibroblasts originating from the Human Genetic Mutant Cell Respository (XPA; GM05509A). In previous experiments with normal cells we have found that white light-induced photon emission dynamics are identical after successive irradiations of approximately 1 min intervals, and even several cycles of illumination and measurement do not quantitatively change the emission intensity for several hours [28]. The light-induced emission curves are hyperbolic as we have reported most recently with mouse melanoma cells [29]. These results confirm several previous investigations in plant and mammalian cells [11,15,16]. As interpreted by Li and Popp [38,39 ], the hyperbolic decay kinetics found in living systems after pre-illumination with white light may indicate coherence of ultraweak photons due to collective excitation of nucleic acids within the DNA of the investigated fibroblasts. In the first experiments with human XPA skin fibroblasts it was found that measurable amounts of ultraweak photons can be achieved with cells densities as low as 2-3x104 cells /ml (data not shown). At these cell densities, control values after irradiation with a white light source for induction of ultraweak photons were determined in mitotic and postmitotic fibroblasts from fresh cells and compared to those of frozen cells. The results are shown in Table 2. Table 2. White light induced ultraweak photon emission (cps/25) in immediately trypsinized monolayer fibroblasts (fresh) compared to fibroblasts transported in liquid nitrogen (frozen)*
*10 ml DMEM Although there was a small increase in the induced photon emission from fresh cells, most probably due to the stress condition of the transport, it can be concluded that the frozen cells showed the same type of emission. Similiar results were obtained for monochromatic induction of the fibroblasts in the range of 300-450nm as shown for MMC- mitotic cells in Fig. 2. Figure 2. Monochromatic light (300-450 nm) induced ultraweak photon emission (UPE; cps/100) in immediately trypsinzed monolayer fibroblasts (fresh) compared to fibroblasts transported in liquid nitrogen (frozen). Average of triplicate determinations are given. Standard deviation is less than 10%. In a previous report [25], we found a slight increase in the dark count rates in postmitotic fibroblasts in XPA cells in contrast to normal fibroblasts. Therefore, the dark count rate at a cell density of 3.6x104 cells /ml in untreated and growth factor treated postmitotic fibroblasts was determined (data not shown) and this increase of the dark count rate in postmitotic cells was confirmed. From these dark count rates a decrease percentage of the accelaration of MMC-induced differentiation could be measured and it can be concluded, that the growth factors reduce the accelaration of differentiation in post-mitotic cells induced by MMC by a factor of 10-30% (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 2 the most significant increase in ultraweak photon emission after monochromatic irradiation of fibroblasts between 300-450 nm was found at 350 nm. Therefore, the induced photon emssion after 350 nm light induction at a cell density of 3.6x104 cells /ml in untreated and growth factor treated MMC-mitotic fibroblasts was determined. In addition, the cells were treated with 400 kJ/m2 UVA as described elsewhere [37]. For mitotic cells, the results are shown in Table 3 showing an improvement of photon absorption ability in XPA-cells for the growth factors in the efficiency range of BP5>BP3>BP2. Table 3. 350 nm monochromatic irradiation induced ultraweak photon emission (%) in mitotic fibroblasts with and without treatment with growth factors in controls and UVA-treated cells (400 kJ). Average of triplicate determinations are given. Standard deviation is less than 10%.
Growth Factor Efficiency: BP5>BP3>BP2 For MMC-treated mitotic fibroblasts similiar results have been obtained as shown in Table 4 as well as for MMC induced-postmitotic fibroblasts (data not shown). Table 4. 350 nm monochromatic irradiation induced ultraweak photon emission (%) in mitotic fibroblasts with and without treatment with growth factors in controls and UVA-treated cells (400 kJ). Average of triplicate determinations are given. Standard deviation is less than 10%.
Growth Factor Efficiency: BP3>BP2=BP5; All very efficient We have previously found that after white light induction there is a small decrease from mitotic to postmitotic fibroblasts from XPA-cells while there is in MMC-treated normal fibroblast a significant increase [28]. Additionally we detected that normal cells absorb UV-photons more efficiently tha XPA-cells [25]. As shown in Table 4, growth factor treatment indeed increase the monochromatic induction in these cells similar to normal cells. Most interestingly, UVA irradiation in mitotic and postmitotic cells significantly reduce the monochromatic induction of ultraweak photons. It can be assumed, therefore, that the decrease in mitotic untreated and MMC treated cells which has been exposed to growth factors is due to absorption of photons, emphasizing a return to normal basal status. As finally summarized, our results indicate that the tested growth factor solutions have an effect on growth and ultraweak photon emission in the differentiation model of human skin fibroblasts and provides a new and powerful non-invasive tool for the development of skin science. Its high sensitivity can be applied in all fields of skin research, in investigating skin abnormalities and in testing the effect and efficacy of regenerative, anti-aging and UV-light protective agents at very low concentrations. Acknowledgements We are indebted to Jeff Moehlenbruck (Sulzer Biologics, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA) for providing us with growth factors. This study was funded in part by grants from the Swiss League Against Cancer (KFS 695-7-1998) and the Erwin Braun Foundation. HN was given generous support by the H +M Kunz foundation (Urdorf, Switzerland) for which this study could be accomplished. We are also indebted to Dr. Max Bracher (Cosmital SA, Research Company of Wella AG, Darmstadt, Germany) for technical support. 4. References [1] A.G. Gurwitsch, S. Grabje and S. Salkind, Die Natur des spezifischen Erregers der Zellteilung. Arch. Entw. Mech. 100 (1923) 11-40. [2] Niggli, H.J., Ultraweak photons emitted by cells: biophotons, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol 14 (1992), 144-146. [3] A. Hollaender and W. Klaus, An experimental study of the problem of mitogenetic radiation. Bull. Nat. Res. Council 100 (1937) 3-96. [4] L. Colli, U. Facchini, G. Guidotti, R. Dugnani Lonati, M. Arsenigo and O. Sommariva, Further measurements on the bioluminesence of the seedlings, Experientia 11 (1955) 479-481. [5] S.V. Konev, T.I. Lyskova and G.D. Nisenbaum, Very weak bioluminescence of cells in the ultraviolet region of the spectrum and its biological role, Biophysics 11 (1966) 410-413. [6] G.A. Popov and B.N. Tarusov, Nature of spontaneous luminescence of animal tissues, Biophysics 8 (1963) 372. [7] A.I. Zhuravlev, O.P. Tsvylev and S.M. Zubkova, Spontaneous endogeneous ultraweak luminescence of the mitochondria of the rat liver in conditions of normal metabolism, Biophysics 18 (1973) 1101. [8] T.I. Quickenden and S.S. Que-Hee, The spectral distribution of the luminescence emitted during growth of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its relationship to mitogenetic radiation, Photochem. Photobiol. 23 (1976) 201-204. [9] J.J Chang, J. Fisch and F.A. Popp (1998) Biophotons, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. [10] H. Inaba, Y. Shimizu, Y. Tsuji and A. Yamagishi, Photon counting spectral analyzing system of extra-weak chemi- and bioluminescence for biochemical applications, Photochem. Photobiol. 30 (1979) 169-175. [11] W.B. Chwirot, G. Cilento, A.A. Gurwitsch, H. Inaba, W. Nagl, F.A. Popp, K.H. Li, Mei, M. Galle, R. Neurohr, J. Slawinski, R.V. Van Wijk and D.H.J. Schamhart, Multi-author review on Biophoton emission, Experientia 44 (1988) 543-600. [12] E. Hideg and H. Inaba, Biophoton emission (ultraweak photon emission) from dark adapted spinach chloroplasts, Photochem. Photobiol. 53 (1991) 137-142. [13] D. Slawinska and J. Slawinski, Biological chemiluminescence, Photochem. Photobiol. 37 (1983) 709-715. [14] I. Panagopoulos , J.F. Bornman and L.O. Björn, Effects of ultraviolet radiation and visible light on growth, fluorescence induction, ultraweak luminescence and peroxidase activity in sugar beet plants , J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 8 (1990) 73-87. [15] R. Van Wijk,and H. Van Aken, Spontaneous and light-induced photon emission by rat and by hepatoma cells, Cell Biophys. 18 (1991) 15-29. [16] W. Scholz, U. Staszkiewicz, F.A. Popp and W. Nagl, Light-stimulated ultra-weak photon reemission of human amnion cells and wish cells, Cell Biophys. 13 (1988) 55-63. [17] F. Grasso, C. Grillo, F. Musumeci, A. Triglia, G. Rodolico, F. Cammisuli, C. Rinzivillo, G. Fragati, A. Santuccio and M. Rodolic, Photon emission from normal and tumor human tissues, Experientia 48 (1992) 10-13. [18] E. Cadenas (1984) Biological chemiluminescence, Photochem. Photobiol. 40, 823-830. [19] J. R. Wright, R. C. Rumbaugh, H.D. Colby and P. R. Miles, The relationship between chemiluminescence and lipid peroxidation in rat hepatic microsomes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 192 (1979) 344-351. [20] B. Devaraj, R.Q. Scott, P. Roschger and H. Inaba, Ultraweak light emission from rat liver nuclei, Photochem. Photobiol. 54 (1991) 289-293. [21] E. Cadenas and H. Sies, Low level chemiluminescence of liver microsomal fractions initiated by tertbutyl hydroperoxide, Eur. J. Biochem. 124 (1982) 349-356. [22] W. Nagl and F.A. Popp, A physical (electromagnetic) model of differentiation. Basic considerations, Cytobios 37 (1983) 45-62. [23] J. B. Birks, Excimers, Rep. Progr. Phys. 38 (1975) 903-974. [24] L. A. Applegate, C. Scaletta, R. Panizzon, H. Niggli and E. Frenk, In vivo induction of pyrimdine dimers in human skin by UVA radiaition: Initiation of cell damage and/or intercellular communication? International J. of Mol. Medicine 3 (1999) 467-472. [25] H. J. Niggli, Artificial sunlight irradiation induces ultraweak photon emission in human skin fibroblasts, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 18 (1993) 281-285. [26] M. S. Eller, M. Yaar and B.A. Gilchrest, DNA damage and melanogenesis, Nature 372 (1994) 413-414. [27] R.N. Tilbury, J. Slawinski, A. Ezzahir, M. Godlewski, T. Kwiecinska, Z. Rajfur, D. Sitko, D. Wienzuchowska, B. Kochel, Q. Gu, F.A. Popp ,E.M. Lilius, P. Marnila, R. Van Wijk and J.M. Van Aken, Multi-author review on Biophoton emission, stress and disease, Experientia 48 (1992) 1029-1102. [28] H.J. Niggli, UV-induced DNA damage and repair: A powerful light trapping system in DNA in order to convert light energy into biochemical signals, in : J.J. Chang. J. Fisch and F.A. Popp (Eds.) , Biophotons, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherland, 1998, 79-86. [29] H. J. Niggli, The cell nucleus of cultured melanoma cells as a source of ultraweak photon emission, Naturwissenschaften 83 (1996) 41-44. [30] K. Bayreuther, H.P. Rodemann, R. Hommel, K. Dittman, M. Albiez and P.I. Francz, Human skin fibroblasts in vitro differentiate along a terminal cell lineage, Proc. natl. Acad. Sci., USA 85 (1988) 5112-1516. [31] H.J. Niggli, K. Bayreuther, H.P. Rodemann R. Röthlisberger and P.I. Francz, Mitomycin C-induced postmitotic fibroblasts retain the capacity to repair pyrimidine photodimers formed after UV-irradiation, Mutation Res. 219 (1989) 231-240. [32] H.J. Niggli, Aphidicolin inhibits excision repair of UV-induced pyrimidine photodimers in low serum cultures of mitotic and mitomycin C-induced postmitotic human skin fibroblasts, Mut. Res. 295 (1993) 125-133. [33] H.J. Niggli and P.I. Francz, May ultraviolet light-induced ornithine decarboxylase response in mitotic and postmitotic human skin fibroblasts serve as a marker of aging and differentiation? Age 15 (1992) 55-60. [34] K. Bayreuther, P.I. Francz, J. Gogol, C. Hapke; M. Maier and H.-G. Meinrath, Differentiation of primary and secondary fibroblasts in cell culture systems, Mutation Res., 256 (1991) 233-242. [35] H.P. Rodemann, Differential degradation of inracellular proteins in human skin fibroblasts of mitotic and mitomycin-C-induced postmitotic differentiation states in vitro, Differentiation, 42 (1989) 37-43. [36] H.P., Rodemann., K. Bayreuther, P.I. Francz, K. Dittmann and M. Albiez, Selective enrichement and biochemical characterization of seven fibroblast cell types of human skin fibroblast population in vitro, Exp. Cell Res. 180 (1989) 84-92. [37] H.J. Niggli and Lee A. Applegate, Glutathione response after UVA irradiation in mitotic and postmitotic human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes, Photochem. Photobiol. 65 (1997) 680-684. [38] F.A. Popp, K.-H. Li and Q. Gu (1992) Recent Advances in Biophoton Research and its Application, World-Scientific, Singapore. International Institute of Biophysics | Research Groups | News/Recent Publications
|